Life from paycheck to paycheck

That's how many people live and it's considered the norm. But what's wrong with it?

First, it's the illusion of stability

It's an illusion. There is no stability at all. As soon as something unforeseen happens: the company goes bankrupt, an employee is laid off or falls ill, all stability immediately disappears, especially given the Russian realities with gray wages. But a white salary does not give much more stability.

For clarity, let's compare it to an investor who invests in various stocks and other financial instruments. Even if he is unlucky and fails in one direction, he will not lose everything, but only a small part and will still stay afloat and his standard of living will not even change. And a worker loses almost everything when he loses his job and his standard of living will change a lot, because he had one single source of income and no other.

In a job you don't like, you lose your freedom, your independence, and it's hard for you to stand up for your principles.

Often employers overstep their authority and force employees to do things:

  • Work overtime without extra pay
  • Take unpaid vacations
  • Write a resignation letter if there is a disagreement with the employer.
  • Do things that are not part of their duties
  • Or even go beyond your principles and views at all.
  • And all this under the fear of dismissal and remain without a job, and therefore without money. And also under the fear of dismissal on a bad article.

An example of how an employer breaks employees, forcing them to violate their principles.

Sima-Land company in Russia forces employees to participate in actions supporting the current government in Russia (2021, 2022) under the threat of dismissal, which strongly contradicts the political views of some employees. It is obviously difficult to be a free person and an honest person under such conditions.

When living from paycheck to paycheck, a person is doomed to work until retirement

Upon retirement, one is doomed to receive miserable pennies (in Russia) and drag out a miserable existence. In comparison, a person with financial freedom can retire when he wants to. Also, relying on social benefits makes a person dependent. Benefits are just handouts.

The main thing to realize is that living from paycheck to paycheck will not make you happy, free, independent, but just the opposite. But there is an alternative - it is financial freedom, and we free people will strive for it.

Author:
If you like this project, please support it financially.Donate

Similar Posts

  • Financial freedom for free people

    We are moving towards financial freedom, saving, managing personal capital and setting up a source of income. But at the same time, we do not become slaves to money. Money is our tool for gaining freedom. In fact, it doesn't take much to be happy. You can live happily in warm countries under a palm tree for $350-600 per month. Anyone can earn this money. We manage money in such a way as to make ourselves free and happy, unlike other people to whom no matter how much money we give, they will not be happy anyway ...

  • Is money energy?

    Is money really energy, as esotericists claim, or is it a very prosaic thing? Let's understand. I will express my opinion based on my experience and knowledge that I have analyzed and was able to develop a certain opinion on this subject. But of course I do not stop and continue to study the topic o ...

  • A free man need not be poor

    Not poor means that you have free money, manage your expenses wisely and have a good source of income or even several. All this makes you feel independent, not stressed about money and makes you feel freer and happier. This is what personal finance management is all about, not becoming a slave to mo ...

Copying allowed only with a link to the source.
Copyright © 2022-present The system of personal freedom.